Books Should Be Free
Loyal Books
Free Public Domain Audiobooks & eBook Downloads
Search by: Title, Author or Keyword

The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe   By:

Book cover

The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe is a comprehensive collection of essays and articles from various American authors, offering unique perspectives on the ongoing conflict in Europe.

The book covers a wide range of topics, from the political climate in the United States to the experiences of American citizens affected by the war. The writing is clear and engaging, providing readers with a deeper understanding of America's relationship with Europe during this tumultuous time.

One of the strengths of the book is its diversity of voices, showcasing the different opinions and viewpoints of Americans from all walks of life. This not only adds depth to the discussion but also highlights the complexity of the issues at hand.

Overall, The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe is a valuable resource for anyone interested in the history of World War I and America's role in the conflict. Highly recommended for historians, scholars, and general readers alike.

First Page:

The New York Times

CURRENT HISTORY OF THE EUROPEAN WAR

JANUARY 9, 1915.

What Americans Say to Europe

[Illustration: CHARLES W. ELIOT

(Photo (c) by Paul Thompson.)

See Page 473 ]

[Illustration: JAMES M. BECK

See Page 413 ]

In the Supreme Court of Civilization

Argued by James M. Beck.

THE NEW YORK TIMES submitted the evidence contained in the official "White Paper" of Great Britain, the "Orange Paper" of Russia, and the "Gray Paper" of Belgium to James M. Beck, late Assistant Attorney General of the United States and a leader of the New York bar, who has argued many of the most important cases before the Supreme Court. On this evidence Mr. Beck has argued in the following article the case of Dual Alliance vs. Triple Entente. It has been widely circulated in France and Great Britain.

Let us suppose that in this year of dis Grace, Nineteen Hundred and Fourteen, there had existed, as let us pray will one day exist, a Supreme Court of Civilization, before which the sovereign nations could litigate their differences without resort to the iniquitous and less effective appeal to the arbitrament of arms.

Let us further suppose that each of the contending nations had a sufficient leaven of Christianity to have its grievances adjudged not by the ethics of the cannon or the rifle, but by the eternal criterion of justice... Continue reading book >>


Book sections



eBook Downloads
ePUB eBook
• iBooks for iPhone and iPad
• Nook
• Sony Reader
Kindle eBook
• Mobi file format for Kindle
Read eBook
• Load eBook in browser
Text File eBook
• Computers
• Windows
• Mac

Review this book



Popular Genres
More Genres
Languages
Paid Books