Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford December Term, 1856. By: Benjamin C. Howard |
|---|
In "Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford December Term, 1856" by Benjamin C. Howard, readers are presented with a detailed account of one of the most significant and controversial rulings in American legal history. In this book, Howard, a legal scholar, meticulously examines the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Dred Scott, which reverberated throughout the nation and ultimately widened the divide between the North and the South on the issue of slavery.
Howard begins by providing a comprehensive overview of the legal proceedings leading up to the Supreme Court's decision. He captures the essence of the case, narrating the events surrounding Dred Scott, an enslaved African American, and John F.A. Sandford, a Missouri resident. The author explores the various legal arguments put forth by both sides and guides readers through the intricacies of the nation's legal system at the time.
One of the book's strengths lies in Howard's sharp analysis of the Supreme Court justices' opinions. He skillfully dissects each judge's stance and diligently examines the implications their opinions had on the outcome of the case. This approach not only provides readers with a deeper understanding of the legal arguments but also offers insight into the prevailing political and social ideologies of the time.
Furthermore, Howard presents the dissenting opinions, shedding light on the intricate internal debates among the justices. By including these dissenting views, the author demonstrates the complexity of the case and the diversity of legal minds within the Supreme Court. These dissenting opinions offer a counterpoint to the majority ruling, offering readers a more diverse and nuanced perspective on the issues at stake.
What sets this book apart is Howard's ability to contextualize the decision within the broader historical and political landscape. He delves into the prevailing societal attitudes towards slavery, the tensions between the North and South, and the long-lasting effects this ruling had on the nation. Through this contextualization, the author highlights the far-reaching consequences of the Supreme Court's decision, which further fueled the flames of the impending Civil War.
While the book succeeds in providing a thorough and meticulous analysis of the Dred Scott decision, it may not be suitable for readers seeking an accessible and introductory examination of the case. Howard assumes a certain level of familiarity with the American legal system and historical context, making it a more valuable resource for scholars, legal professionals, and those well-versed in United States history.
In conclusion, "Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford December Term, 1856" is a scholarly and comprehensive analysis of one of America's most controversial Supreme Court rulings. Benjamin C. Howard's meticulous approach, combined with his contextualization of the decision, makes this work a valuable resource for those interested in exploring the intricacies of the Dred Scott case and understanding its significant impact on American history. REPORT OF THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND THE OPINIONS OF THE JUDGES THEREOF, IN THE CASE OF DRED SCOTT VERSUS JOHN F.A. SANDFORD. DECEMBER TERM, 1856. BY BENJAMIN C. HOWARD, FROM THE NINETEENTH VOLUME OF HOWARD'S REPORTS. WASHINGTON: CORNELIUS WENDELL, PRINTER. 1857. CONTENTS Syllabus Mr. Chief Justice Taney (majority opinion) Mr. Justice Wayne (concurrence) Mr. Justice Nelson (concurrence) Mr. Justice Grier (concurrence) Mr. Justice Daniel (concurrence) Mr. Justice Campbell (concurrence) Mr. Justice Catron (concurrence) Mr. Justice McLean (dissent) Mr. Justice Curtis (dissent) SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. DECEMBER TERM, 1856. DRED SCOTT VERSUS JOHN F.A. SANDFORD. DRED SCOTT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN F.A. SANDFORD. This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Missouri. It was an action of trespass vi et armis instituted in the Circuit Court by Scott against Sandford... Continue reading book >>
|
| eBook Downloads | |
|---|---|
|
ePUB eBook • iBooks for iPhone and iPad • Nook • Sony Reader |
Kindle eBook • Mobi file format for Kindle |
|
Read eBook • Load eBook in browser |
Text File eBook • Computers • Windows • Mac |
| Review this book |
|---|