The Electoral Votes of 1876 Who Should Count Them, What Should Be Counted, and the Remedy for a Wrong Count   By: David Dudley Field (1805-1894)

In "The Electoral Votes of 1876: Who Should Count Them, What Should Be Counted, and the Remedy for a Wrong Count" by David Dudley Field, the author delves into the controversial and historically significant Presidential election of 1876 in the United States. Field's objective is to shed light on the complex legal and constitutional issues surrounding the counting of electoral votes during this critical period in American politics.

From the outset, Field's expertise as a lawyer and his thorough understanding of legal procedures become evident. He meticulously analyzes the Constitution's provisions related to the electoral vote-counting process and dissects the arguments put forth by various stakeholders at the time. His research and attention to detail are commendable, leaving no stone unturned in an attempt to provide a comprehensive exploration of the subject matter.

One of the book's strengths lies in Field's ability to communicate complex concepts in a manner that is accessible to both legal scholars and lay readers. He breaks down intricate legal arguments into digestible segments, ensuring that the reader can grasp the significance of each point. Moreover, Field skillfully weaves together historical context and legal analysis, creating a narrative that is engaging, informative, and enlightening.

Field's work presents multiple perspectives on the contentious issues at play during the 1876 election, raising thought-provoking questions with relevance even in contemporary times. The author tackles dilemmas such as determining who should have the authority to count electoral votes, what should be considered valid votes, and the appropriate course of action in case of an inaccurate count. By examining these enduring questions through the lens of historical events, Field opens up a discourse on electoral practices that will resonate with readers concerned about the integrity of democratic processes.

While "The Electoral Votes of 1876" offers a comprehensive analysis of its subject matter, the book's length may prove daunting for some readers. Nonetheless, Field's meticulousness and attention to detail make it worth the effort for anyone seeking an in-depth understanding of this particular chapter in American political history.

In summary, David Dudley Field's "The Electoral Votes of 1876: Who Should Count Them, What Should Be Counted, and the Remedy for a Wrong Count" is an engrossing exploration of the complex legal and constitutional issues surrounding the counting of electoral votes during a pivotal moment in U.S. history. Field's insightful analysis, coupled with his ability to communicate intricate ideas effectively, makes this book a valuable resource for those interested in electoral processes and their implications.

First Page:

The electoral votes of 1876 have been cast. The certificates are now in Washington, or on their way thither, to be kept by the President of the Senate until their seals are broken in February. The certificates and the votes of thirty four of the States are undisputed. The remaining four are debatable, and questions respecting them have arisen, upon the decision of which depends the election of the incoming President. These questions are: Who are to count the votes; what votes are to be counted; and what is the remedy for a wrong count? I hope not to be charged with presumption if, in fulfilling my duty as a citizen, I do what I can toward the answering of these questions aright; and, though I happen to contribute nothing toward satisfactory answers, I shall be excused for making the effort... Continue reading book >>