The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved In 50 Arguments By: William A. (William Asbury) Williams (1854-)
In "The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved In 50 Arguments" by William A. Williams, the author attempts to challenge the widely accepted theory of human evolution using a series of arguments. However, despite the book's ambitious title and the author's seemingly scientific approach, the arguments ultimately fall short of disproving evolution. One of the main issues with this book is the lack of credible scientific evidence supporting the author's claims. Williams relies heavily on outdated and debunked theories, cherry-picked data, and sparse references to support his arguments. This undermines the book's premise of being scientifically grounded and makes it difficult for readers to take the author's arguments seriously. Furthermore, Williams often confuses the idea of evolution with natural selection, making flawed assumptions that weaken his overall case. His understanding of the concepts appears to be shallow, which is evident in his attempts to discredit evolutionary theory based on misconceptions. Another drawback of this book is the author's tendency to resort to biased and unscientific reasoning. Williams often presents his own personal beliefs and religious convictions as evidence against evolution, which further weakens the book's scientific credibility. The inclusion of such subjective viewpoints diminishes its objectivity and undermines its potential to engage in a meaningful scientific discourse. Moreover, the writing style of "The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved In 50 Arguments" lacks clarity and coherence. The organization of the arguments feels disjointed, making it difficult for readers to follow the author's line of reasoning. Additionally, the book lacks proper structure and thorough analysis of opposing viewpoints, depriving readers of a balanced assessment of the topic at hand. Despite its flaws, the book does raise some interesting questions regarding the limits of scientific understanding and the nature of scientific theories. However, these points are overshadowed by the author's biased approach and lack of reliable evidence. In conclusion, "The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved In 50 Arguments" by William A. Williams fails to deliver on its promise to scientifically discredit human evolution. The book's shortcomings in providing credible evidence, flawed reasoning, and biased perspective make it a challenge for readers genuinely seeking a thoughtful and rigorously scientific exploration of the topic. First Page: E text prepared by Dave Maddock THE EVOLUTION OF MAN SCIENTIFICALLY DISPROVED IN 50 ARGUMENTS By REV. WILLIAM A. WILLIAMS, D.D. Designed (1) As an up to date text book, and a companion to all other text books on evolution; and (2) As an antidote to books in libraries teaching evolution, infidelity and atheism; and (3) As an aid to all students, parents, teachers, ministers, lawyers, doctors, and all other lovers of the truth. THE EVOLUTION OF MAN MATHEMATICALLY DISPROVED INTRODUCTION Let it be understood, at the outset, that every proved theory of science is to be accepted. Only the most intense prejudice and the maddest folly would lead any one to reject the proved conclusions of science. Moreover, we should examine any new hypothesis with open minds, to see if it has in it anything truthful, helpful or advantageous. It should neither be accepted nor rejected simply because it is new. But if a theory is evidently or probably untrue, or pernicious, or at all harmful, it is to be rejected and condemned. Some facts and objections are herein submitted to the serious seeker after truth, in the hope that a theory so out of harmony with the facts, and so destructive to the faith and the cherished hopes of man, may be completely discarded... Continue reading book >>

The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved In 50 Arguments By: William A. (William Asbury) Williams (1854-)

In "The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved In 50 Arguments" by William A. Williams, the author attempts to challenge the widely accepted theory of human evolution using a series of arguments. However, despite the book's ambitious title and the author's seemingly scientific approach, the arguments ultimately fall short of disproving evolution.

One of the main issues with this book is the lack of credible scientific evidence supporting the author's claims. Williams relies heavily on outdated and debunked theories, cherry-picked data, and sparse references to support his arguments. This undermines the book's premise of being scientifically grounded and makes it difficult for readers to take the author's arguments seriously.

Furthermore, Williams often confuses the idea of evolution with natural selection, making flawed assumptions that weaken his overall case. His understanding of the concepts appears to be shallow, which is evident in his attempts to discredit evolutionary theory based on misconceptions.

Another drawback of this book is the author's tendency to resort to biased and unscientific reasoning. Williams often presents his own personal beliefs and religious convictions as evidence against evolution, which further weakens the book's scientific credibility. The inclusion of such subjective viewpoints diminishes its objectivity and undermines its potential to engage in a meaningful scientific discourse.

Moreover, the writing style of "The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved In 50 Arguments" lacks clarity and coherence. The organization of the arguments feels disjointed, making it difficult for readers to follow the author's line of reasoning. Additionally, the book lacks proper structure and thorough analysis of opposing viewpoints, depriving readers of a balanced assessment of the topic at hand.

Despite its flaws, the book does raise some interesting questions regarding the limits of scientific understanding and the nature of scientific theories. However, these points are overshadowed by the author's biased approach and lack of reliable evidence.

In conclusion, "The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved In 50 Arguments" by William A. Williams fails to deliver on its promise to scientifically discredit human evolution. The book's shortcomings in providing credible evidence, flawed reasoning, and biased perspective make it a challenge for readers genuinely seeking a thoughtful and rigorously scientific exploration of the topic.

First Page:

E text prepared by Dave Maddock

THE EVOLUTION OF MAN SCIENTIFICALLY DISPROVED

IN 50 ARGUMENTS

REV. WILLIAM A. WILLIAMS, D.D.

Designed (1) As an up to date text book, and a companion to all other text books on evolution; and

(2) As an antidote to books in libraries teaching evolution, infidelity and atheism; and

(3) As an aid to all students, parents, teachers, ministers, lawyers, doctors, and all other lovers of the truth.

THE EVOLUTION OF MAN MATHEMATICALLY DISPROVED

INTRODUCTION

Let it be understood, at the outset, that every proved theory of science is to be accepted. Only the most intense prejudice and the maddest folly would lead any one to reject the proved conclusions of science. Moreover, we should examine any new hypothesis with open minds, to see if it has in it anything truthful, helpful or advantageous. It should neither be accepted nor rejected simply because it is new. But if a theory is evidently or probably untrue, or pernicious, or at all harmful, it is to be rejected and condemned.

Some facts and objections are herein submitted to the serious seeker after truth, in the hope that a theory so out of harmony with the facts, and so destructive to the faith and the cherished hopes of man, may be completely discarded... Continue reading book >>

eBook links
Wikipedia – William A. (William Asbury) Williams
Wikipedia – The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved In 50 Arguments

eBook Downloads
ePUB eBook • iBooks for iPhone and iPad • Nook • Sony Reader	Kindle eBook • Mobi file format for Kindle
Read eBook • Load eBook in browser	Text File eBook • Computers • Windows • Mac