The Supposed Autographa of John the Scot   By: Edward Kennard Rand (1871-1945)

In "The Supposed Autographa of John the Scot," Edward Kennard Rand provides a meticulous analysis of a controversial topic that has captivated scholars and theologians for centuries. The book delves into the intricacies of ancient manuscripts attributed to the enigmatic figure of John the Scot, also known as John Scottus Eriugena, a renowned philosopher and theologian of the Middle Ages.

Rand's expertise in medieval manuscripts shines through as he examines various documents purportedly penned by John the Scot. With remarkable attention to detail, he delves deep into their content, script, and historical context, leaving no stone unturned in his pursuit of understanding their true authorship.

One of the book's greatest strengths lies in Rand's ability to present complex arguments in a clear and accessible manner. Amidst the scholarly debates concerning the authenticity of these manuscripts, the author skillfully navigates through conflicting evidence, offering a balanced analysis that encourages readers to form their conclusions. Rand's unbiased approach enhances the academic rigor of the book, assuring readers that they are engaging with reliable research.

Additionally, the book is enriched by Rand's insightful discussions on the broader implications of the supposed autographa. He places them within the intellectual and religious context of ninth-century Europe, shedding light on John the Scot's theological legacy and his significant contributions to Christian thought. Rand adeptly juxtaposes the manuscripts with other works attributed to John the Scot, creating a comprehensive framework that illuminates the fascinating world of medieval philosophy.

However, some readers may find certain sections of the book overwhelming due to the highly specialized nature of the subject matter. Rand's meticulous examination of manuscript details, such as paleographic analysis or intricate textual comparisons, might prove taxing for those unfamiliar with the field. Nevertheless, the author's explanatory footnotes and well-organized chapters mitigate the potential confusion, ensuring that even non-experts can follow the argument and appreciate the depth of Rand's scholarship.

"The Supposed Autographa of John the Scot" is an invaluable contribution to the field of medieval studies. Edward Kennard Rand's comprehensive research serves as a beacon of scholarly excellence, providing a valuable resource for anyone interested in the life and works of John the Scot or the complexities of ancient manuscripts. By skillfully examining the evidence, Rand invites readers into the intriguing world of medieval theology, offering a nuanced exploration of an enduring enigma.

First Page:

In the fifth part of Ludwig Traube's Palaeographische Forschungen , (which I had the honor of publishing after that great scholar's death)[1] evidence was presented for Traube's apparently certain discovery of the very handwriting of John the Scot. In manuscripts of Reims, of Laon, and of Bamberg, he had observed certain marginal notes which were neither omitted sections nor glosses, but rather the author's own amplifications and embellishments of his work. Johannes had made such additions to his De Divisione Naturae in the Reims manuscript, and they all appear in that of Bamberg. In the latter manuscript there are fresh additions or enlargements as I shall call them in the present paper which have similarly been absorbed into the text in two manuscripts now in Paris. We thus have, in an interesting series, the author's successive recensions of his work. One of the shorter forms is the basis of the text published by Thomas Gale in 1681; the most complete form was edited by H. J. Floss in 1852 from the Paris manuscripts... Continue reading book >>